Supreme Court Protects Child Porno

4--28--2002

Five Supreme Court justices, led by Anthony Kennedy, made one of the most vile, sick judgements known to that too-oft sick body. Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer joined Kennedy in protecting "virtual" child pornography in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition.

It would be difficult to imagine something as sick as this ruling were one not already familiar with the sickness that pervades the entire practice of law and bench-sitting in the legal profession.

No decent citizen of this nation would consider child pornography - so-called "virtual" or otherwise - as "speech" or protected under the wildest of any constitutional argument. But lawyers and judges, those on the supreme bench especially, seem particularly able to reason such corrupt thinking into some kind of court decision.

What we have here, from sick decisions of justices tainted by liberal doses of the institutionalized stupidity that arises from within our legal system, is two new "rights" never imagined in the remotest universe of the Founding Fathers and the Constitution they wrote: the Right to Filth, and the Right of Evil.

No nation which promotes and protects such morally-destructive garbage can possibly survive as free or prosperous. The legal system and those responsible within it must accept their share of the blame for the sewer-ward spiral that they have facilitated. The decision is another prime example of why all federal justices (especially their nine supreme majesties) need to be held responsible before the nation by standing for regular election or reelection, and subject to overrule by Congress.

God help us, as our courts obviously will not.